Sustainable HRM Practices on Employee Performance

 


Introduction

Managing HR is challenged in the current global context due to globalization, demographic changes, technological development, changes in educational background of employees and their expectations regarding working conditions, work-life balance. As a result of these challenges Work stress and employee burnout situations have risen making management of HR more challenging.
In the Sri Lankan context, ageing labour force, increasing demand for skills due to globalization whilst at the same time the redundancies which happen due to the technological development adding more onto unemployment in the country. Under utilization of skill, not adequate training opportunities for adult learners are also other challenges faced by the HR managers. These challenges create extreme pressure on the business that the human side of HR is also challenged nowadays.
As per De Prins et.al (2014), some scholars argue that sustainable HRM could serve as a possible solution for bringing humanity back into HRM, while sustainability refers to resource regeneration, development, and renewal. Sustainable HRM highlights the importance of HR practices for organizational outcomes that go beyond financial performance. Employee performance is defined as “the level of productivity of an individual employee, relative to his or her peers, on several job-related behaviors and outcomes” (Twaissi, Naseem M; Omar, Alhawtmeh M; O'la, Al-Laymoun Hmoud;, 2022). A study of Nadarajah et al. (2012) demonstrated a direct and positive connection among HRM practices and job performance. The current study examines the impact of sustainable HRM practices on employee performance by focusing on three sustainable HRM practices including sustainable recruitment and selection, sustainable training and development and sustainable motivation and rewards.



Sustainable HRM Practices

By integrating sustainability into HRM, a new branch emerged as Sustainable HRM (Opatha,2019). The word sustainability means “longer” or “durable”; it means that what you do today has a positive effect on tomorrow. According to Ehnert et al. (2016), Sustainable HRM is referred as “the adaption of HRM strategies and practices that enables the achievement of financial, social, and ecological goals, with an impact inside and outside of the organization and over a long-term time horizon, while controlling for unintended side effects and negative feedback”. Ehnert (2008) states that sustainable HRM is aimed at attracting and retaining motivated and talented employees as well as providing them with a healthy work environment and opportunities to develop. According to him, sustainable HRM is another option for employment relationships, and it contributes to corporate development. According to Paille et al. (2014), sustainable HRM contributes to improving green performance of staff members and has direct and indirect effects on the organization and employees. As per Wikhamn (2019), customer satisfaction in Swedish hotels has positively affected with sustainable HRM practices within the organizations and sustainable HRM practices have played a significant role in enhancing the organizational performance. Guerci et al. (2014) viewed sustainable HRM from the stakeholder perspective. According to him, HRM practices are challenged with the integration of growing number of stakeholders’ needs and to aid the long-term viability of organizations, organizations keep gradually adopting a stakeholder perspective in their sustainability strategy, an HRM function that operates solely towards the value creating for the bottom-line employees. Manzoor et al. (2019) revealed that sustainable HR Practices, i.e. selection, training, participation, and employee empowerment, 1424 17th International Conference on Business Management have a significant and positive effect on job performance and training has a positive moderating role on job performance. A study by Arman (2017), assesses how these various instruments of sustainable HRM create an impact on organizational performance. According to him, human resource recruitment and selection, human resource marketing and misemployment have positive impact on organizational performance. 



Sustainable Recruitment and Selection

Employee selection is an important activity in organizations and aims to assess individual characteristics which are considered as important in predicting applicants’ future effectiveness as employees and it is an important practice which selects right employees with necessary characteristics for the organization (Manzoor et al.,2019). Recruitment and selection of a new employee is costly for an organization and obviously it is a lengthy process. To eliminate the unwanted costs related with recruitment and selection, sustainable recruitment and selection is used which goes beyond traditional recruitment and selection. According to Kepha et al. (2014), recruitment and selection affect personal performance of employees and the relationship between recruitment and selection and employee performance was highly significant. Manzoor et al. (2019) have investigated that sustainable selection process is positively related to employee performance. Mwita and Kinemo (2018) found that green recruitment and selection practices contribute to attracting more qualified job candidates.



Sustainable Training and Development

Training is organized attempt at which an employee is trying to acquire efficient performance in activities. Development is a process of planning and preparing employees for future challenges. Sustainable training and development help to correct the behaviors of employees as well as help in adopting new technologies (Khan et al., 2016). 



Sustainable Motivation and Rewards

Motivation is a force that enables an individual to act towards a particular goal. It is meant to facilitate behavior alteration of individuals (Shahzadi et al., 2014). Asim (2013) has concluded that employee performances are enhanced with employee motivation. A study of Shahzadi et al. (2014) has showed a significant positive relationship between employee motivation and employee performance. Rewards have positive impact on employee performance in organizations because rewards increase the work efficiency of workers of the organization 1425 University of Sri Jayewardenepura (Ajila & Abiola, 2004). Rewards promote the happiness and job satisfaction and thereby employee performances (Boehm & Lyubomirsky, 2008). Monetary and nonmonetary rewards motivate the workers of any organization and these rewards also resulted in higher growth and productivity (Reio & Callahon, 2004).



Conclusion

According to the findings of the study, most tested sustainable HRM practices are available and willing to be implemented in companies, except the practices which require high IT knowledge and resources (practices like using video conferencing for interviews, holding web seminars and online courses). Highly practiced sustainable recruitment & selection practice is the usage of online advertisements for recruitment. Highly practiced sustainable training & development practice is selection of trainers from within the company. Highly practices sustainable motivation & rewards practice is giving recognition and accomplishment for employees. From the selected sustainable HRM practices, sustainable recruitment & selection has a significant negative impact on employee performance, sustainable training & development has no significant impact on employee performance and sustainable motivation & rewards have a significant positive impact on employee performance. From among the identified constraints for practicing sustainable HRM practices, lack of knowledge was the most affecting constraint. There were few empirical limitations of this study. Use of one private sector company for the analysis was the major limitation. This has limited the possibility of generating accurate conclusion for whole private sector is limited. Future research studies are recommended to include more private sector companies as well as public sector organizations. Selecting only three sustainable HRM practices was another limitation. Future research is encouraged to consider other HRM practices including employee empowerment, employee participation, pay for performance, fair evaluation systems etc.


References

Opatha, H. D. N. P. (2019), ‘Sustainable Human Resource Management: Expanding Horizons of HRM’, Department of Human Resource Management, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Stankeviciute, Z. and Savaneviciene, A. (2014) ‘Sustainability As a Concept for Human Resource Management’, Economics and Management, 18(4), pp. 837–846. doi: 10.5755/j01.em.18.4.5631.

Stankevičiute, Ž. and Savanevičiene, A. (2018) ‘Designing sustainable HRM: The core characteristics of emerging field’, Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(12). doi:

10.3390/su10124798. Wikhamn, W. (2019), ‘Innovation, sustainable HRM and customer satisfaction’, International Journal of Hospitality Management. Elsevier, 76(March 2018), pp. 102–110. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.04.009.

Twaissi, Naseem M; Omar, Alhawtmeh M; O'la, Al-Laymoun Hmoud;, 2022. Taylor & FrancisOnline. [Online]
[Accessed 01 November 2025].

 

Comments

  1. This is a clear and detailed study. You have explained the topic well with good examples and research support

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you so much for taking the time to share that feedback. I’m really glad the study came across clearly and that the examples and research added value. My aim was to make the topic not just informative but also practical, so it means a lot to hear that it resonated with you.

      Delete
  2. A well-researched exploration of sustainable HRM within the Sri Lankan context, demonstrating how recruitment, training, and reward systems impact performance. The discussion on empirical limitations and future research directions adds rigor and credibility. This post offers a meaningful contribution to sustainable HRM literature and practice.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you so much for engaging with the piece so thoughtfully. I really value how you’ve highlighted the balance between practical HR systems—like recruitment, training, and rewards—and the need for ongoing empirical rigor. For me, the Sri Lankan context makes these questions especially urgent, because sustainable HRM isn’t just about performance metrics, it’s about dignity, wellbeing, and long-term trust in our institutions. Your recognition of the limitations and future research directions is encouraging—it reminds me that this is a shared journey of inquiry and practice, not a finished conversation

      Delete
  3. This article highlights how sustainable HR-practices can improve employee performance and loyalty in Sri Lanka. It also links to my experience at a state-owned bank, where applying long-term HR strategies could help strengthen staff engagement and retention.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. you’ve made such an important connection here. Sustainable HR isn’t just about policies—it’s about creating workplaces where people feel valued and respected over the long term. Your reflection on the state-owned bank really resonates, because institutions like that often struggle with short-term fixes instead of investing in deeper engagement strategies. When staff see that leadership is committed to their growth and wellbeing, loyalty and performance naturally follow. Thank you for bringing your lived experience into this conversation—it’s exactly these insights that make the case for long-term HR reform in Sri Lanka feel real and urgent.

      Delete
  4. This is a comprehensive, research-driven, and academically strong blog that effectively explores the connection between Sustainable HRM practices and employee performance. The work stands out for its use of credible academic literature, clear explanation of key HRM dimensions, and meaningful contextualization to Sri Lanka’s workforce and business environment.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you so much for taking the time to share this generous reflection. I’m really glad the blog resonated with you, especially in connecting sustainable HRM practices to the realities of Sri Lanka’s workforce. My aim was to move beyond theory and make the research feel practical and relevant for professionals and institutions here, so it means a lot to hear that the balance of academic grounding and local context came through clearly. Your encouragement reinforces the importance of continuing to bridge credible scholarship with lived workplace experiences

      Delete
  5. This is a very insightful summary that clearly explains how sustainable HRM practices improve both employee performance and organizational success. It highlights the importance of ethical recruitment, training, and rewards in creating a motivated and productive workforce.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for sharing such thoughtful feedback. I really appreciate how you’ve captured the essence of sustainable HRM—it’s exactly about linking ethical practices with both people’s wellbeing and organizational strength. When recruitment, training, and rewards are handled with fairness and care, employees feel valued, and that energy naturally translates into better performance and long-term success. It’s encouraging to see this perspective resonate, because it shows we’re moving toward workplaces that prioritize dignity alongside productivity

      Delete
  6. Interesting read! The point about globalization and technological changes putting pressure on HR resonates strongly. Sustainable recruitment and selection practices could be a game-changer, ensuring that the workforce is not only skilled but also aligned with long-term organizational goals. It would be great to explore measurable KPIs that reflect sustainable HRM’s impact on performance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You’ve raised such an important point. Globalization and tech shifts really do challenge HR to move beyond short-term fixes and think about sustainability in how we bring people into organizations. Recruitment and selection aren’t just about filling vacancies anymore—they’re about shaping a workforce that can thrive in the long run. I love your idea of measurable KPIs. Imagine tracking not only retention or productivity, but also indicators like employee wellbeing, diversity of hires, and alignment with organizational values. Those kinds of measures would show whether HR is truly building resilience and purpose into the workforce, rather than just chasing numbers.

      Delete
  7. It’s interesting to see which sustainable HRM practices companies use most, especially the focus on online recruitment and internal trainers. The results about motivation and rewards having a positive impact on performance are very insightful.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, it’s encouraging to see how sustainable HRM practices are evolving in real workplaces. Online recruitment and internal trainers show that companies are investing in both efficiency and people development, which is a powerful combination. And the link between motivation, rewards, and performance really highlights that when employees feel valued, they give their best. It’s a reminder that sustainability in HR isn’t just about systems—it’s about creating environments where people can thrive.

      Delete
  8. The study's focus on a single private-sector organisation severely restricts the findings' transferability, even if it offers insightful information about how sustainable HRM practices affect employee performance. The detrimental effects of sustainable hiring and selection can call into question methodological or contextual elements that were not thoroughly examined. Furthermore, the study ignores other significant components, including employee empowerment, involvement, and equitable evaluation methods, due to its limited focus on just three HRM practices. Future research's validity and applicability would be strengthened by a more comprehensive, multi-sector approach.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really appreciate your thoughtful feedback. You’re absolutely right that focusing on a single private-sector organisation limits how far the findings can be applied, even if they do shed light on the link between sustainable HRM practices and employee performance. Your point about the potential downsides of sustainable hiring and selection is especially important—it reminds us that context and methodology need to be examined more carefully to avoid unintended consequences. I also agree that leaving out areas like empowerment, involvement, and fair evaluation narrows the scope of the study. These are critical dimensions of sustainable HRM that deserve equal attention if we want a fuller picture of how people experience these practices. Your suggestion for a broader, multi-sector approach is very valuable. It would not only strengthen the validity of future research but also make the insights more relevant across different organisational settings. Thank you for highlighting these gaps—it helps frame the next steps in a way that’s both practical and meaningful.

      Delete
  9. Insightful post! Sustainable HRM practices not only support long-term business goals but also boost employee performance and engagement. A timely and important discussion

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for sharing your thoughts! I completely agree — when HR practices are designed with sustainability in mind, they create a ripple effect that benefits both the organization and its people. It’s encouraging to see more conversations highlighting how employee well-being and long-term business success go hand in hand

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Industrial-Organizational Psychology and Importance

Impacts of Motivation & Job Satisfaction Among Hotel Workers